Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Smith's avatar

Mike, this was great to see. I appreciate you stepping outside of your normal wheelhouse, and the enthusiasm to share this view showed through.

I agree with your assessment. Our current trajectory is surely one of more isolation and loneliness, where an elite handful of people sort of rule the roost, and everyone else is just cordoned off into their own little silos. It's incumbent on us to raise awareness of this trajectory, and you're doing excellent work here to move the conversation forward.

I'll do what I can to amplify thought pieces like this.

Expand full comment
Harry Law's avatar

“If you thought TikTok was addictive, or that Instagram held you visually in the infinite scroll, Generative A.I. will enable the design of unprecedented immersion that movies, music, art or other people, just won’t be able to compete with.”

This is a really good articulation of one of the central concerns associated with increasingly capable systems. In many ways it comes down to ‘manipulation’ - i.e. exerting influence by bypassing a person’s capacity for rational deliberation. The stickiness of AI systems has a lot in common with social media use (though I agree it could be much more severe), where first and second order preferences rub up against each other to the detriment of the user. (Here, first order basically means ‘what i want to do right now’ whereas second order is about ‘what type of person I want to be’. For example, I may not want to spend hours on TikTok – but I sure do want to watch just one more video.)

There's a lot of good work underway to understand the mechanisms by which systems can manipulate, the differences between persuasion and manipulation, and how AI can be built in a way that respects personal autonomy. There's obviously much farther to go, so I'm glad to see this sort of analysis!

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts