OpenAI isn't IPO ready when compared to Anthropic, and that's a credibility problem. Remember, OpenAI is roughly 5 years and 3 months older than Anthropic.
It looks like somebody is trying to make his own rules to stay CEO: Under the new rules, CEO Sam Altman would only need one-third of the board's support to remain CEO..
Only a year bro: Ex-OpenAI exec Sutskever says he spent a year gathering proof of alleged Altman dishonesty | Reuters https://share.google/NIptq2bglwWvMN9Ei6
“A.I. represents…a vision of a near-total takeover of the country’s economic, social and cognitive lives by tools engineered by just five companies, run by five particular people, several of whom are widely described as sociopaths.”
Satya Nadella is now also a billionaire and called the early open AI board amateur City.
I'm curious if he did what was right for his pocketbook or what was right for Microsoft?
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/microsoft-ceo-satya-nadella-says-openai-was-amateur-city.html
It looks like somebody is trying to make his own rules to stay CEO: Under the new rules, CEO Sam Altman would only need one-third of the board's support to remain CEO..
https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-sam-altman-supermajority-majority-vote-fire-the-ceo-2026-5
Only a year bro: Ex-OpenAI exec Sutskever says he spent a year gathering proof of alleged Altman dishonesty | Reuters https://share.google/NIptq2bglwWvMN9Ei6
Sam Altman has essentially been using his position at openai for personal gain. not just once but dozens of times. https://x.com/i/status/2053845354575991099
OpenAI has ushered in such a world:
“A.I. represents…a vision of a near-total takeover of the country’s economic, social and cognitive lives by tools engineered by just five companies, run by five particular people, several of whom are widely described as sociopaths.”
NYT Op-Eds are out of control: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/08/magazine/ai-populism-backlash-altman.html